SERM’s in Treatment of Breast Cancer
Ravindra B. Saudagar1*, Nachiket
S. Dighe2, Deepak S. Musmade3 , Vinayak
M. Gaware4 and D. A. Jain5
1Department of Pharmaceutical
Chemistry, R.G.Sapkal College of Pharmacy, Nashik, M.S. India.
2Department of Pharmaceutical
Chemistry, Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy, Loni, MS, India-413736.
3Department of Pharmaceutical
Chemistry, Sanjivani College of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research, Kopargaon, MS. India.
4Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry,
College of Pharmacy, Chincholi, MS, India.
5Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Bhagwant University, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: ravisaudagaur@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
Selective
estrogen receptor modulators are the class of a chemical compounds acting on a
estrogen receptors. These are selectively inhibit or stimulate the estrogen
like actions in various tissues. SERMs play a key role in breast cancer chemoprevention.
These agents antagonize estrogens in some tissues and mimic their action in
others. The mechanism for tissue selectivity appears to be related to
differences in their molecular and three-dimensional structures, which affect
the transcriptional activity of the activated estrogen receptor. For example, tamoxifen and toremifene act as
estrogen antagonists in breast tissue and as estrogen agonists in the endometrium. The present review article is directed towards
highlighting the importance of SERMs in treatment of breast cancer.
INTRODUCTION:
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs)
are a class of compounds that act on the estrogen receptor.1 A
characteristic that distinguishes these substances from pure receptor agonists and antagonists is that
their action is different in various tissues, thereby granting the possibility
to selectively inhibit or stimulate estrogen-like action in various tissues. Phytoserms are
scientifically accepted SERMs from a botanical source. The rationale
behind cancer chemoprevention is based on the hypothesis that the multi-step
process of carcinogenesis can be modulated, arrested or reversed by natural or
synthetic agents2. Chemoprevention can be divided into primary (to
prevent the onset of disease in healthy individuals at risk); secondary (to
treat a population with a premalignant condition in order to arrest the
development of cancer) or tertiary (to protect subjects cured of an initial
cancer against second primary tumours).
SERMs play a key role in breast cancer chemoprevention.
These agents antagonise estrogens in some tissues and
mimic their action in others. The mechanism for tissue selectivity appears to
be related to differences in their molecular and three-dimensional structures,
which affect the transcriptional activity of the activated estrogen receptor.
For example, tamoxifen and toremifene
act as estrogen antagonists in breast tissue and as estrogen agonists in the endometrium. Conversely, raloxifene
behaves as an estrogen antagonist in both the breast and the endometrium3.
CHEMISTRY4, 5
The SERMs belong to several different chemical classes
such as triphenylethylenes, benzothiophenes,
naphtalenes, indoles, chromane and benzopyran
compounds, all of which are not steroidal compounds. By contrast, most of the
‘pure’ antioestrogens are derivatives of the natural oestrogen, oestradiol, although
recently ‘pure’ antiestrogens with a non-steroidal
chemical structure have been developed.
PHARMACOKINETICS
The pharmacokinetics of the SERMs is complex and the
knowledge is incomplete. This may be due to a combination of physicochemical
properties of the compounds and low blood concentrations of the drugs and their
metabolites (usually in the range of 1–200 ng/ml),
resulting in analytical difficulties. In addition, for several of the
compounds, a long half life makes protocols for determination of these
parameters difficult 6.
ABSORPTION AND BIOAVAILABILITY7,
8
In general the absorption of SERMs is good, but the
bioavailability is often reduced due to an extensive first-pass metabolism.
Because no SERM has been administered by the intravenous route to humans, the
exact bioavailability of any of these drugs has not been evaluated properly.
Thus, we have to rely on indirect evidence. While the absorption of tamoxifen, droloxifene, toremifene, raloxifene and idoxifene is good an extensive first-pass metabolism due to
glucuronidation followed by biliary
excretion may reduce the bioavailability of tamoxifen,
droloxifene and raloxifene.
On the contrary, first pass metabolism seems to be low for compounds like toremifene and idoxifene.
MEMBERS AND USES4, 5, 9
SERMs are used dependent on their pattern of action in
various tissues:
Table no. 1: Members and Uses
Other members
include afimoxifene, arzoxifene
and bazedoxifene. Some SERMs may
be good replacements for hormone
replacement therapy (HRT), which had been commonly used to treat
menopause symptoms until the publication of wide scale studies showing that HRT
slightly increases the risk of breast
cancer and thrombosis.
Some of the above agents still have significant side-effects which
contraindicate widespread use.
MECHANISM OF ACTION 10, 11, 12
Estrogenic
compounds span a spectrum of activity ranging from: full agonists (agonistic in
all tissues) such as the natural endogenous hormone estrogen
mixed agonists/antagonistic (agonistic in some tissues while antagonist in
others) such as tamoxifen (a SERM) pure antagonists (antagonistic in all
tissues) such as Fulvestrant (ICI-182780).
The mechanism of mixed agonism/antagonism may differ
depending on the chemical structure of the SERM, but for at least for some
SERMs, it appears to be related to (1) the ratio of co to co-repressor proteins
in different cell types and (2) the conformation of
the estrogen receptor induced by drug binding which in turn determines how
strongly the drug/receptor complex recruits co-activators (resulting in an
agonist response) relative to co-repressors (resulting in antagonism). For
example, the prototypical SERM tamoxifen acts as an
antagonist in breast and conversely an agonist in uterus. The concentration of
steroid receptor co-activator 1 (SRC-1; NCOA1)
is higher in uterus than in breast, therefore SERMs such as tamoxifen
are more agonistic in uterus than in breast. In contrast, raloxifene
behaves as an antagonist in both tissues. It appears that raloxifene
more strongly recruits co-repressor proteins and consequently is still an
antagonist in the uterus despite the higher concentration of co-activators
relative to co-repressors.
Figure no: 1:
Mechanism of action of SERMs
ACTIONS 13,
14
·
The actions of SERMs on various tissues:
·
Bone turnover and postmenopausal osteoporosis
respond favorably to most SERMs, although premenopausal women may experience
bone loss with some SERMs including tamoxifen.
·
Breast -
all SERMs decrease breast cancer risk and tamoxifen
is mainly used for its ability to inhibit growth in estrogen receptor-positive
breast cancer.
·
Cholesterol and triglycerides -
levels respond favorably to SERMs.
·
Deep
venous thrombosis - the risk may be elevated in at least some
SERMs.
·
Hot
flashes are increased by some SERMs.
·
Pituitary
gland - clomifene blocks estrogen action,
leading to an increase of follicle-stimulating
hormone.
·
Uterus -
tamoxifen may increase endometrial
carcinoma risk, but raloxifene and femarelle do not. Data on toremifene
and clomifene is insufficient.
Figure 2: Decision points
that a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) must pass to modulate
estrogen-like actions in a target tissue. A SERM can bind to either estrogen
receptor (ER)-α or ER-β and the complexes can then recruit
co-activators or co-repressors. The complexes might homo or heterodimerize
and modulate genes by either a nontraditional pathway of protein–protein interactions
via binding of Fos and Jun proteins to activating
protein 1 (AP-1) or a traditional pathway of ER–DNA interaction via an
estrogen-response element (ERE).
THE PERFECT SERMs
Figure 3: Ideal properties of SERMs
Because of the potential cancer and cardiovascular
risks inherent in hormone pills containing estrogen and progesterone,
scientists are working on the development of SERMs for postmenopausal women
that can mimic the beneficial effects of estrogen without exerting any of its
harmful effects. The ideal drug, of course, would be a SERM exhibiting the
positive effects of estrogen on bones, heart and blood vessels, without
exhibiting the potentially harmful effects of estrogen on the breast and uterus15.
THE NEED FOR BETTER SERMS
The fact that tamoxifen
blocks the action of estrogen in breast tissue while mimicking the action of
estrogen in the uterus means that it functions as a SERM, selectively blocking
or stimulating the estrogen receptors of different target tissues. In addition
to acting like estrogen in the uterus, tamoxifen
resembles estrogen in its ability to lower LDL cholesterol levels. And in
postmenopausal women, tamoxifen also resembles
estrogen in its ability to preserve or increase bone density. Thus, aside from
its tendency to increase the risk of uterine cancer, tamoxifen
has a number of potentially beneficial properties. As a result, scientists have
been actively working on the development of other SERMs that might exhibit some
of the beneficial properties of tamoxifen without sharing
its potentially harmful effects16.
Figure 4: The Need for Better SERMs
SERMS AND BREAST CANCER
SERMs for the treatment of breast cancer
Tamoxifen 17, 18,
19
Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer among
women in the United States , with 180 000 new cases diagnosed annually and in
the year 2000 alone there were more than 40 000 deaths. It is thought that
estrogen has a role in the pathogenesis of many forms of neoplastic
and non-neoplastic diseases, including breast cancer,
endometrial cancer, endometriosis and uterine fibroids. Under normal
circumstances, estrogen binds to the ER to activate gene transcription.
Improper or excessive signaling by estrogen can lead to the development of
cancer. Tamoxifen was the first SERM to be utilized
in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with clinical use beginning in
the 1970s. Over the past 25 years, tamoxifen has
evolved as an agent used in all stages of breast cancer. Tamoxifen
is most effective in ER-positive breast cancers. The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group’s findings were that
adjuvant use of tamoxifen increases the 10-year
survival of women with ER positive tumors and in women whose ER status is
unknown. Although tamoxifen has been very successful
in treating breast cancer, it is associated with insidious side effects, such
as thromboembolic events, vasomotor symptoms and an
increased risk of developing endometrial cancer and cataracts . Since then,
researchers have worked to develop new SERMs with no estrogenic activity on the
uterus and with fewer side effects.
Toremifene 20, 21
The triphenylethylene antiestrogen toremifene has been
approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in
postmenopausal women. The biologic effects of this SERM in postmenopausal women
are similar to those of tamoxifen. Since toremifene has similar efficacy to that of tamoxifen as a first line endocrine therapy in the
treatment of ER positive metastatic breast cancer, limited use has been seen in
the United States. Furthermore, other hormonal agents such as aromatase inhibitors are also indicated as first line
therapies for advanced breast cancer, limiting the use of toremifene.
Although toremifene may be advantageous as an
alternative to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy of breast
cancer, it has not yet been approved by the FDA as an adjuvant therapy.
Raloxifene 22, 23
Raloxifene is currently
being used clinically to treat and prevent osteoporosis. It does, however, act
as an ER antagonist in breast tissue and it has been studied as an alternative
to tamoxifen in the treatment of metastatic breast
cancer. Preclinical studies found that raloxifene
provided no advantage over tamoxifen in treating
postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Furthermore, in cases where
the cancer became refractory to tamoxifen therapy, raloxifene conferred no additional antitumor activity and
thus it was never pursued as a breast cancer therapy. However, since tamoxifen was found to increase the risk of endometrial
cancer, there has been a renewed interest in raloxifene
especially since postmenopausal women currently taking raloxifene
for osteoporosis may harbor clinically undetected breast cancer. Therefore, a
trial was designed to assess the efficacy of raloxifene
in women with advanced breast cancer. The study included postmenopausal women
with metastatic breast cancer without any prior systemic treatment. The results
of this study were disappointing; only 33% of participants showed clinical
benefit. Due to the low efficacy, raloxifene has not
been pursued as a treatment for advanced breast cancer; rather, it is gaining
new attention as a prophylactic therapy to prevent breast cancer in high-risk
women.
Fulvestrant 24, 25
The agonist properties of tamoxifen
and other SERMs can contribute to an increased risk of endometrial carcinoma
and might contribute to the development of resistance in tumor cells. Ideally,
pure antiestrogens might combat these difficulties.
The development of pure antiestrogens was pursued
with the production of steroidal analogues of estrogen with bulky side chains
at either the 7 or 11 position of estradiol. One of
these drugs, Fulvestrant (Faslodex,
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals and Wilmington, DE) has recently been approved for
use in advanced breast cancer.41 Fulvestrant is
approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The drug has notable
efficacy in tamoxifen-refractory disease. In
addition; the drug has demonstrated equivalent or superior activity when
compared with anastrozole in the metastatic setting.